Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+vs\s+K3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+vs\s+K3\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion II vs K3 (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:28:13 -0500; Well, I thought this topic would get a few readers at least. Please note that this is not a post to start a flame war or a contest of sorts, or even a comparison of performance or features. I've read; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00502.html (8,377 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion II vs K3 (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:49:09 -0500; After reading the recent reviews on the Omni VII, maybe I could get by without the second receiver. Any opinions on the cw receive audio and the passband tuning? -- Wayne Whitman Cell:270-282-3550 ww; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00505.html (9,972 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion II vs K3 (score: 1): Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:49:47 -0400; I've got an Orion I (v1) and a K3. I'm not sure if I can provide helpful input Wayne because my experience of the Orion is that it certainly doesn't sound harsh and the PBT seems fine, although it do; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00509.html (7,642 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II vs K3 (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:05:47 -0500; Thanks to all who responded. A lot of you provided good tips for operating the Orion II. I am reconsidering the Omni VII for portable work after receiving many emails with nothing but good things to; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00528.html (10,458 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]