Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+Sweep\s+and\s+Tuning\s+Rates\s+\-\s+a\s+small\s+experiment\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion II Sweep and Tuning Rates - a small experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:14:04 -0600
After all of the gnashing of teeth about the sweep not updating during tuning and whether it's useful or not, etc. etc., I decided to try and figure out when it worked, and when it didn't. Ok, it you
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00625.html (8,778 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sweep and Tuning Rates - a small experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:36:44 -0700
Hey Grant...while on the discussion of nits-in-bits, this is what I discovered with CW and the NR. Pretty simple and seems to be a great combo. Be light on the RF gain, like notning below 90... make
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00626.html (9,803 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sweep and Tuning Rates - a small experiment (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:49:32 -0500
FAST rate is only 250 steps per rotation, and SLOW amount to mere 62.5 steps per rotation, making it feel too much "digital" if STEP is 100 Hz, and too slow with 625 Hz per rotation, if STEP is 10 Hz
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00628.html (7,341 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sweep and Tuning Rates - a small experiment (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:10:02 EST
Grant, Doesn't help me at all as I use step size 10, tuning rate fast. Don't know any other way to get good SSB tuning as 100 step size is too much to tune well. Thanks for the research! 73, Lee ____
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00630.html (7,132 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sweep and Tuning Rates - a small experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:25:27 -0600
That's my normal setting, too. But now at least I know's there a setting that will generally keep the sweep updating. I was probably the last one figure to figure it out, though :-) Grant/NQ5T _____
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00632.html (8,160 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sweep and Tuning Rates - a small experiment (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:33:56 EST
Grant, It makes complete sense, as I'm sure that the encoder pulses are what is a higher priority than sweep update is. As long as lots of em are coming into the CPU, more masking of updating the swe
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00634.html (7,478 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu