Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+2\s+or\s+IC\-7800\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+2\s+or\s+IC\-7800\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion 2 or IC-7800 ? (score: 1): Author: Randy K7RAN <k7randy@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:00:27 -0700; If price were no object (say, hypothetically, if both rigs cost exactly the same), which radio would you prefer? Along that line, are there certain operating "types" who might prefer one more than th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00737.html (7,244 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 or IC-7800 ? (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:00:44 -0600; Orion 2 for me - receiver performance is everything when one has to use compromise antennas. I can afford either (with some belt tightening), but the Orion does all I need and then a bunch more. Also; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00739.html (7,201 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 or IC-7800 ? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:43:00 -0600; HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. ROTFLMAO. Larry, N0XB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00755.html (8,310 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]