Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+\/\s+Pro\s+II\s+DSP\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+\/\s+Pro\s+II\s+DSP\s+Question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion / Pro II DSP Question (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:31:21 EST; Hello all, still contemplating a new rig after the first of the year. Is there anyone here who has owned both the Orion and Pro II, that can tell me which DSP / NR sytem is better for handling urban; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00144.html (7,371 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion / Pro II DSP Question (score: 1): Author: "K Van Horn" <k7ec@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:48:30 -0600; Hi Todd, The receiver in the Orion is quieter and the noise blankers (hardware and DSP) in the Orion work better. Quite frankly, Icom could have left the NB switch off of the IC756PRO II and it would; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00145.html (10,741 bytes)
3. RE: [TenTec] Orion / Pro II DSP Question (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:47:45 -0500; I've owned both. The NR is much better in the Orion, although the PROII isn't too bad. The NB in the ProII is about useless. The Orion has the best NB I've ever used and I've had most of the top radi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00146.html (8,018 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]