Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Original\s+Orion\s+FW\s+2\.x\s+Upgrades\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Original\s+Orion\s+FW\s+2\.x\s+Upgrades\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Original Orion FW 2.x Upgrades (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:19:27 -0600; there 2.0 a the old Why does this continue to be asked when TT has made it clear that they are working to keep the original Orion on the upgrade path at least for the near future? Since we're now on; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01341.html (7,439 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Original Orion FW 2.x Upgrades (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:04:56 -0500; there 2.0 a the old AC5AA: are working to keep the original Orion on the upgrade path at least for the near future? Because some have nothing better to do with their time than publicly whine. Good g; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01346.html (7,895 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Original Orion FW 2.x Upgrades (score: 1): Author: "John T. Gwin" <jtgwin@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:52:58 -0600; "Because some have nothing better to do with their time than publicly whine. " Watch your in-box for private reprimands. When I made a recent, similar comment about the core group of experts, I found; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01347.html (6,959 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Original Orion FW 2.x Upgrades (score: 1): Author: "Joseph A. & Ruth O. Ryan" <ablee@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:12:21 -0500; Thanks, Bill 73's Joe, KX4JR _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01357.html (8,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]