Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Operating\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Operating\s+CW\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: supton@eece.maine.edu (Shawn Upton); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 11:28:16 -0400; This summer I hope to do some CW work with my 1340, and maybe my old Atlas if I can get it working (but that radio would most likely see mobile operation SSB). Anyhow, how do most people do CW? I've; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00207.html (7,659 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 11:42:14 EDT; << Anyhow, how do most people do CW? I've seen stuff for keyers, paddles, and the like; I'm wondering, what does most people use to do CW? >> Hi Shawn, the first priority is to get the speed up, the; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00208.html (8,472 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: randas@mindspring.com (randas@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 11:54:59 -0400; I feel everyone should be able to use a hand key. Up to 10wpm they are great. Some guys use them up to 20wpm.. but I'd say "most" cw op are useing paddles or bugs past 13wpm. The last thing to use wh; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00210.html (10,076 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 08:58:27 -0700; Over the last 37 years of hamming 99% of my CW has been with a STRAIGHT key at 20 - 30 WPM. I never liked electronic keyers. I am, however, starting to use one of my many Vibroplex bugs. Reid, K7YX T; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00211.html (9,569 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (N4LQ); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 12:52:53 -0400; The TenTec keyer is non-iambic. Most folks use the Iambic keyers. Although there are various preferrences, generally, the Iambics are easier to use. As for paddles, you will end up trying different o; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00216.html (8,993 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 13:19:29 -0400; How about American Morse? Just kidding. Get yourself a paddle and plug it into the keyer of a TenTec rig. Otherwise get one of those Curtis keyer kits and have a go at it. BTW, I have a Bencher iamb; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00218.html (8,055 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 14:45:49 -0500; If I were starting out today, I think I would go straight to paddles. Forget the straight key, bug, whatever. Straight to paddles. I would still be learning about spacing, but not having to haul need; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00224.html (9,641 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 15 Apr 1999 15:23:36 -0500; Curtis keyer kits are obsolete, and the chip no longer available on general market. The current keyers are the TICK kits, and those from Jackson Harbor Press, and I think I am leaving out another, be; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00227.html (7,903 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (N4LQ); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 16:29:58 -0400; I've got a couple of KR-40 keyers with internal paddles. I like the feel of the paddles. This model uses permanent magnets instead of electromagnets for tension. What bothers me is that the dashes se; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00229.html (8,592 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 22:29:59 +0100 (BST); I agree that a hand key is a good start, but if you start with a hand key, do try to set it up correctly. If the spring tension requires you to jump up and down to close the key, then its going to ti; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00234.html (12,444 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 19:09:15 -0500; Not really, but how about CMOS Superkeyer III? I have used II for a few years now and like it very much. I am now building III for the desk and II will be in the car permenantly. I recommend it high; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00237.html (7,995 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: whowell@hq.nasa.gov (Scott Howell); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 21:09:09 -0400; om, your using the key incorrectly. Let me just abuse a little bandwidth for a second. I have nothing against paddles, bugs, keyboards, or banging two wires together. I felt as you, but found that fo; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00242.html (9,526 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 22:24:10 +0200; When I learned the code towards the Danish 12 wpm test, I barely passed (11 wpm OK, 12 no). The test was of course with a hand key. The licence arrived a few days after, and I went on air on 80m, but; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00262.html (8,108 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 01:16:27 +0100 (BST); Agreed; the Superkeyer III is a great little gizmo. It has only one snag for me. It does not run in the "Ultimatic" mode; its iambic. For those unfamiliar with the Ultimatic keyer of yesteryear, (12; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00263.html (9,918 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]