Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+vs\s+Orion\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul DeWitte K9OT" <k9ot@mhtc.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:37:34 -0600
Denton, if you put in the Inrad CW roofing filter you can sit right along side of those big boys and not have them bother you. The only thing that will bother you is those brand X radios that have Ke
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00478.html (7,122 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:47:59 -0600
You mean "Brand Y". :-) 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com Denton, if you put in the Inrad CW roofing filter you can sit right along side of those big boys and not have them bo
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00479.html (7,399 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Omni VI vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:23:37 -0800 (PST)
General comment on all the comments... Yes, with the Orion I can hear in closer to a bellowing mastadon than the DX I am trying to work - at times... But distance helps me there... The mastadon is us
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00483.html (9,768 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:44:07 +0000
Just a minor quibble: with the Orion set up for normal operating, with 8msec risetime (as discussed ad nauseum in the past) and 50% weighting on the transmitted cw - I'm skeptical about true unmuting
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00486.html (7,324 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:32:39 -0800
Probably because I'm a slow plodder on the key, I notice the slow recovery on the Orion (v2059) as well. In fact, it seems no faster than my VI+ with slow AGC and delay set at 1. Some time ago N4PY n
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00487.html (8,711 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:50:30 -0800
Couple of comments-- TT posted the Omni VI specs this morning and while they seem to be better than the competition, I don't believe the close in dynamic range is greater than the VI+ and certainly n
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00491.html (9,395 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:46:03 -0600
Interesting discussion about the QSK. I'm not convinced it's quite as good as my venerable TS-930S, though I haven't done a side-by-side comparison. I also haven't played with any of the CW/QSK varia
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00498.html (9,798 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu