- 1. [TenTec] Omni VI vs. TS-850 (score: 1)
- Author: ditzian@alltel.net (Jan Ditzian)
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 13:38:07 -0500
- Floyd, When I got my Omni VI, I did a head-to-head comparison with a TS-850 owned by another ham. The results don't fit what you have, but they fit your conclusion. With a speaker, whether external o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00069.html (9,076 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Omni VI vs. TS-850 (score: 1)
- Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:52:02 -0500
- only one SSB Oftentimes, the wider Omni ladder filters have slightly asymmetrical filter skirts which cause the received audio passband to sound different between USB and LSB. The INRAD filters solv
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00070.html (7,544 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Omni VI vs. TS-850 (score: 1)
- Author: badger@vbe.com (Michael Melland)
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 13:31:30 -0600
- I have owned but one other rig prior to experiencing the Ten-Tec phenomenon. Having had such limited exposure, I'm still thrilled with the performance of my Omni V and find no need to look for the H
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00072.html (7,758 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Omni VI vs. TS-850 (score: 1)
- Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:48:14 -0600
- Jan, You description that the Omni VI sounds good on headphones clearly shows it is not the filters, but is the speaker. Speakers need to be checked for warpage from time to time if built in or exter
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00073.html (7,532 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Omni VI vs. TS-850 (score: 1)
- Author: sentek@sprintmail.com (Floyd Sense)
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:43:59 -0500
- Interesting. I live within a day's drive of Sevierville, and intend to go listen to an Omni as soon as I get a reasonable answer to the questions. In my case, it isn't a question of 850 vs. the Omni
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00075.html (10,965 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu