Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+v\s+FT102\s+receive\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+v\s+FT102\s+receive\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec OMN I VI (score: 1): Author: Curt Benjamin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:05:51 +0000 (UTC); David, if I didn't have three bread snappers at home (teen girls) using up all my spare radio money, I'd buy your Omni 6. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00042.html (6,947 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI display readout (score: 1): Author: Malcolm McLeman <f5vbu@cegetel.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:22:21 +0100; Failing vision (AMD) is making frequency readout of my Omni VI untenable even at display brightness menu setting max 15. I doubt there's any way to increase this but would be grateful for any suggest; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00044.html (6,869 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI v FT102 receive (score: 1): Author: Bob McGraw K4TAX <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:46:18 -0600; And how did you determine the difference in receiver sensitivity? The specified sensitivity for the FT-102 is 0.25 uV preamp on, 1.0 uV preamp off. The Omni VI sensitivity is 0.16 uV. I would say; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00045.html (8,115 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI v FT102 receive (score: 1): Author: Malcolm McLeman <f5vbu@cegetel.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:21:43 +0100; Thanks your reply Bob.. I did say purely under operational circumstances and by that I mean simply comparing the two receivers with the same receive signal.. I'll take your word for the technical spe; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00046.html (9,127 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]