Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+owners\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: k5zg@alpha.wcoil.com (Wayne Hudson)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 21:56:54 -0500
I am quite interested in an Omni VI. Have a TS870 that is terrible on CW on 160-40 with DSP filter leakage and all sorts of gobbledegook in the background even with the AIP (which is turning off the
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00132.html (7,840 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: crobson@erie.net (Chris Robson)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 06:59:26 -0500
Hud, I bought Ten-Tec gear Because I lived close to some powerful contesting stations(K3TUP,K3LR just for starters), and I can't for the life of me know what your talking about, I got rid of a Kenwo
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00133.html (8,363 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:16:19 -0500 (EST)
<< Hud, I bought Ten-Tec gear Because I lived close to some powerful contesting stations(K3TUP,K3LR just for starters), and I can't for the life of me know what your talking about, I got rid of a Ken
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00135.html (8,398 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: milewski@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU (Steve Milewski)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 05:39:43 -0800
Most times I am amazed at the Omni VI's ability to filter out all the unwanted trash off to the sides. I'm using the recommended filter set-up (2.4, 1.8 SSB filters and the .50 and .25 CW filters wit
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00137.html (8,822 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: ea2sn@jet.es (Jon Iza)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 14:45:58 -0800
Read here on the reflector: Nope, Europeans don't buy the Omni VI because TenTec is not interested on going thru the ordeal of getting their rigs certified for the European EMC directives, so there a
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00138.html (8,824 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: PChristensen@Continental.com (PChristensen@Continental.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:29:01 -0500
Two years ago, I replaced all 30+ bandswitching diodes with HP 5082-3081 in addition to making Ten-Tec's Omni Six second-order modification through the resistor change. Additionally, I changed all t
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00139.html (9,058 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: owen@piper.eeel.nist.gov (James C. Owen, III)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 11:24:27 -0500 (EST)
Steve, This is not a fault of the Omni VI. These are actual signals radiated by the stations with the key clicks and they fall on the frequency to which you are listening. There is no way for you to
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00140.html (8,489 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: dwright@microagesf.com (Dave Wright)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:01:47 -0800
Wayne, I am more than just happy with my Omni-VI's receiver performance, I'm plain overjoyed! I happen to live less than 1 mile from a 50kw AM Broadcast station with the lobe pointed right at me. I h
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00141.html (9,973 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Omni VI owners (score: 1)
Author: w.dillon@ic.ac.uk (Wayne Dillon)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 17:08:52 GMT
Hi all, From a very satisfied Ten Tec user (un the UK) the reason we don't buy Ten Tec [new] is because of the regulations enforced by the EEC (Lord bless their little cotton socks). As I understand
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00142.html (10,382 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu