Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Dilema\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Dilema\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Newell Crary" <ncrary@owt.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:20:57 -0800; I have been trying to decide what radio to buy. I have a Scout and want to upgrade to an Omni. I have read a post that talked about subtle changes TT made to the OMNI series over the production years; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00463.html (6,864 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:21:57 +0000; Go to this link http://www.tentecwiki.org/doku.php?id=transceivers and select the transciever that you want to check out. There are links to reports as well as some great info on each rig to help wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00465.html (8,698 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:36 -0800; Hi Newell....I'm over here in Pendleton....have an Omni vi plus upgraded to option 3 that I am considering selling..... What do you have for a power supply? Mic? -- Original Message -- From: "Newell; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00466.html (8,671 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:51:14 +0000; Newell, FYI there's info on Omni 6 evolution over the years at http://www.n1eu.com/Mods/omni6plus.htm 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00469.html (8,552 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "John Cox" <jecox@tri-lakes.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:10:27 -0600; How do you update an Omni VI Plus to Option 3? Did you mean an Omni VI updated to Option 3. 73 John Cox kc0yai _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00472.html (9,832 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:44:49 -0800; Well..hmmmm.... front panel says... omni vi plus upgraded....and documentation I got with the rig specifies to option 3. -- Original Message -- From: "John Cox" <jecox@tri-lakes.net> To: "Discussion; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00473.html (10,725 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:00:54 -0600; Also, go to the Sherwood Engineering site and look at their receiver performance data. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00475.html (10,140 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:39:15 -0600; One way to tell. If the model/SN label says 564 it is an Omni VI Plus. If it says 563 it is an Omni VI. Located below the Tentec logo the front panel clearly says Omni VI Plus if it is a Plus. The up; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00476.html (12,973 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:19:12 -0600; If you have the funds and can find a clean late serial number Omni VI Plus, go for it. Other wise, a Omni VI opt is a good performing radio. Here's some history supplied by others from this link: htt; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00477.html (15,268 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Dilema (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:31:05 -0600; Add the Inrad cw roofing filter to the Omni VI/VI+ and according to Inrad specs, it's 2khz IMD dynamic range is between an Orion and an Orion II as compared to Sherwood Engineering data. I'm running; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00478.html (15,025 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]