Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\-\s+receive\s+signal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\-\s+receive\s+signal\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI- receive signal (score: 1): Author: vsantis@javanet.com" <vsantis@javanet.com (Vincent A. Santis); Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 09:13:48 -0500; HI, Over the past 8 to 9 months I've been using my Omni VI+ almost exclusively on cw. I have a condition that is annoying . I have the TT 1.8, 500 and 250 filters in the 6.3 Mhz slots. What I find is; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00229.html (6,992 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI- receive signal (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 07:58:42 -0800 (PST); Interesting. This is how I would describe the CW filtering effect for my Kenwood 440. I get a very raspy sound. The bassy part should be "fixable" by use of the PBT control, does this help? Move it a; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00231.html (7,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]