Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+vs\s+Icom\s+756\-Pro\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+vs\s+Icom\s+756\-Pro\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: nr2v@northnet.org (d l); Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:34:34 -0400; Wondering if any of the readers may have opinions on the Omni + vs the 756 overall pro's and con's I would like to hear what you have to say thanks Please email direct & 73 Dean -- FAQ on WWW: http:/; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00032.html (7,796 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: n4ydu@worldnet.att.net (Nathan Moreschi); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:28:26 +0100; The IC 756 PRO is a far better radio than the OMNI VI. I owned and OMNI VI for seven years and loved and recently upgraded to a PRO three months ago. The DSP filtering is awesome as is the spectrum s; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00034.html (9,099 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:39:05 -0500; Nathan, I have to echo your statements based upon my experience with the PRO over the past several months. But, I would take minor issue with the notion that the spectrum scope, dual receive, keyers,; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00036.html (9,826 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: ke5c@vvm.com (John, KE5C); Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:58:20 -0500; I really tried to turn the other cheek and walk away from this one. On eHam.net, the 756PRO was reviewed 54 times with an average rating of 4.5/5. The OMNI VI+ was reviewed 23 times with an average; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00037.html (10,298 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (k4sqr@juno.com); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:11:16 -0400; That may be true, but a Model 564 Omni VI Plus is a better rig than the 563 Omni VI, and Dean's question addressed the "Plus" vs Pro. Cheers, Jim, K4SQR Jim Miller, K4SQR http://www.comteksystems.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00038.html (10,369 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: n4ydu@worldnet.att.net (Nathan Moreschi); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:19:24 +0100; Hi John. I'm a cw op. I'm an intense cw contester and the pro passes the test easily. I participated in the cqww wpx contest nearly two weeks ago and never had any difficulty in copying signals. I'll; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00039.html (11,939 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: ke5c@vvm.com (John, KE5C); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:29:48 -0500; OMNI Hi Nate! I've not noticed that with my pair of 400 Hz INRAD's. This has also been beat around the bush, but for contesting as well as general operating I prefer those to a pair each of TT 500's; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00040.html (8,797 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 08:13:52 -0700; While the PRO is good, I find that I can work a DX station on the Omni VI+ while I'm trying to get the whistles to blow and the bells to ring on the PRO. In the mean time, with the OMNI, I'm off work; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00041.html (11,013 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: ke5c@vvm.com (John, KE5C); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:46:40 -0500; Hi Bob! Talk about past history: in the early 80's I had the same experience with my Omni-D beating out my TS-930S (with Fox-Tango filters - INRAD's predecessor) as my 28 Mhz EME IF! I'll always won; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00042.html (8,597 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: jlockj@earthlink.net (John Lockhart); Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:34:31 -0000; All radios are nice. However, rigs without the ability to select narrow filters in the high IF's when operating CW have problems with nearby big signals that fall within their WIDE SSB roofing filter; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00070.html (8,328 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:05:15 -0700; Thats exactly why I have a both a 1.8KHz SSB filter and a 500 Hz CW filter in the high IF on the Omni VI+. It's a killer of a receiver with also a 1.8KHz SSB in the low IF, a 500 Hz and 250Hz CW filt; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00071.html (9,138 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]