Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+firmware\s+rev\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+firmware\s+rev\.\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:19:37 -0400; This is getting interesting. He checked and his 6+ has rev 1.02. Again, mine is 1.03. Then I found this in the archives: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2001-09/msg00106.html So it a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00926.html (16,368 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:24:50 -0400; Steve N4LQ wrote: This is getting interesting. He checked and his 6+ has rev 1.02. Again, mine is 1.03. Then I found this in the archives: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2001-09/msg; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00928.html (9,452 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike_n4nt@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:32:13 -0400; Steve, there are apparently trade-off's that must be made to appease the nit pickers who hang 'round here. They find some little thing "wrong" and carp on it until it becomes a huge problem. Then Ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00936.html (20,973 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 11:46:18 -0400; Mike: Bypassing the entire microprocessor is easy on the 6+. I've been running it that way for some time now. Keying up to 100 wpm with excellent QSK is the result. The downside is that you loose you; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00937.html (26,289 bytes)
5. Fw: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:28:55 -0400; this, please chime in! It turns out there's an easy way to rule out PLL timing issues and whether you're on logic chip V1.02, V1.03 or any other logic chip for that matter... If you remove the back; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00938.html (7,901 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:53:00 -0400; Neat trick Paul. I tried this and it does resolve the slow keying issue and like you said, kills the sidetone. It also caused the off-set error because the vco is no longer shifting frequency on key-; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00939.html (8,659 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 13:01:26 -0400; QSK with V1.02 is pretty damn fast as long as plug 52 is removed on the IF/AF circuit board. -Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00940.html (8,963 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 13:09:26 -0400; Yea. I just need to get back to V1.02. Hopefully Tentec can accommodate this. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00942.html (9,571 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike_n4nt@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 13:22:34 -0400; Hi, Steve-- My post, although it must have seemed otherwise, was not directed at you. It is not picky to note that one cannot get proper code from a rig at speeds over 25 wpm. I am just talking about; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00943.html (19,256 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 14:12:00 -0400; For a point of reference, I can clearly hear band noise between dits at 35WPM with V1.02. I would consider about 40 WPM on this rig to be the upper useful limit if one must hear between keyed elemen; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00944.html (9,101 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:07:07 -0400; If TenTec can't supply 1.02, I wonder if there is someone out there who can copy an Eprom? I don't have the equipment here. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00945.html (10,200 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:38:08 -0400; I though the same thing. I listened for band noise at about 40 -50 wpm and didn't hear a thing but when Tom hit his key, it popped right through at 80 wpm. True for both the Triton and Omni 6+ in mod; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00948.html (10,283 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:21:55 -0400; Paul Christensen wrote: Note: All the above is with firmware ver. 1.03. I have no idea what 1.02 does but apparently it does key faster. QSK with V1.02 is pretty damn fast as long as plug 52 is remov; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00954.html (9,410 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:30:13 -0400; Plug 52 is the well know cure for clicky QSK in your headphones. It's on the logic board and control board. Just unplug it. QSK will greatly improve. No one understands why it's there in the first pl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00955.html (9,868 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:07:01 -0400; There were far too many replies to answer each one individually. The mod consists of unplugging connector 52 on the I.F./A.F. Board. = That's it. Plug 52 should have only one wire attached to it. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00957.html (10,622 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:40:44 -0400; Paul Christensen wrote: What's plug #52? The mod consists of unplugging connector 52 on the I.F./A.F. Board. = Wow - this is quite nice. Disconnecting that plug makes sidetone work as I prefer, and b; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00959.html (9,247 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:37:35 -0000; The plug 52 problem arose because a segment of established Omni users expressed a strong preference for sidetone volume to be independent of RX AF gain setting. Ten Tec responded to user pressure by; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00965.html (11,544 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:30:17 -0400; Bob Henderson wrote: The plug 52 problem arose because a segment of established Omni users expressed a strong preference for sidetone volume to be independent of RX AF gain setting. Ten Tec responded; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00967.html (14,003 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:38:39 -0000; Hi jason I can't disagree with you. I suppose I would have been more correct in saying, QSK operation resulted in audible clicks in the headphones with P52 connected. Like you, I just moved the conne; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00970.html (15,086 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]