Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+Keying\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+Keying\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:52:17 -0700; I just did an interesting experiment comparing my Paragon 585 (aka "Paragon 1") to an Omni 6+ that I just picked up on Ebay. When I connect my Inrad Key Pulser ( http://www.qth.com/inrad/) to the Par; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00243.html (7,624 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:17:59 -0400; I don't have experience with a 'pulser' as I've always found it much easier to tune by holding the key down or using the TUNE button. But yes, when Ten Tec changed to Logic chip v1.03, supposedly to; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00244.html (8,959 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:54:47 -0700; The TUNE button is easier on the operator, but can be harder on the PA if it isn't designed for RTTY service. It also keeps my cantenna dummy load from overheating when testing amplifiers as was the; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00246.html (10,408 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 06:26:49 -0500; The Paragon is responding correctly. The pulser is keying the keyer of the Omni VI+. Depending on the Keyer Speed of the Omni VI+ it will be different. 73 Bob, K4TAX _________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00247.html (9,080 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 06:06:33 -0700; No, Bob, I hooked the Key Pulser to the "KEY" input of the Omni 6+ not the keyer paddle input. Otherwise I would still be getting a string of CW characters when I set the pulser to 100% instead of a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00248.html (10,841 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:32:00 -0400 (EDT); Speaking of logic chips... I've got an Omni VI Opt 1 that is in need of some TLC. I'm thinking about sending it to TenTec for them to go through and bring it back to its prime. A couple questions: 1.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00249.html (8,554 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:12:54 -0000; They sometimes do upgrade 'things' You could include a letter saying' Please do not change the XYZ chip. a call. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00250.html (10,097 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:53:16 -1000; No experience with the pulser. I have looked at my Omni VI (version 3) keying envelope with my Tektronix 466 storage scope while sending a string of dits from a Logikeyer K-3, with no weighting added; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00267.html (9,658 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0700; Interestingly enough, Ken, I just tried using the Omni 6+ with its internal key. With the keyer adjusted for about 30 WPM, a string of dits gives what appears to be an ~33% duty cycle, but I would ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00274.html (11,183 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:27:37 -1000; Hi Michael, I don't know what version firmware is in my Omni VI version 3 radio. Maybe it has the "microchirp". No one has complained about it to me. I'll try listening to it with another receiver to; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00282.html (9,840 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:28:13 -0700; If found some derivations on the internet that suggest that WPM = 2.4 X the dit frequency. The specs on INRAD website say 50ms pulse rep rate = 48 WPM, which would be consistent with that number (1/5; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00295.html (11,612 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:44:40 -0500; Could some of these issues be the difference between and Omni VI opt 3 and a Omni VI+? Although the Omni VI with opt 3 installed does have the same features as the Omni VI+, from my experience, they; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00296.html (9,536 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Keying (score: 1): Author: "Don and Diana Cunningham" <wb5hak@duracom.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:33:51 -0500; Thanks to all for the suggestions. I'll get the rig on the bench tonight and investigate all the good suggestions. 73, Don, WB5HAK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00047.html (6,665 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]