Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+vs\s+OMNI\s+VI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+vs\s+OMNI\s+VI\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:37:20 -0500; It's interesting to compare the ORION's numbers against the venerable OMNI VI. In a QEX article (9-10/02) T. Raczek included a table showing the drop-off in performance between measurements at 20 kHz; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00366.html (7,166 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:17:41 -0500; W3ULS wrote: It's interesting to compare the ORION's numbers against the venerable OMNI VI. In a QEX article (9-10/02) T. Raczek included a table showing the drop-off in performance between measureme; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00381.html (7,499 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: "Zivney, Terry L." <00tlzivney@bsu.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:33:41 -0500; W3ULS wrote: It's interesting to compare the ORION's numbers against the venerable OMNI VI. In a QEX article (9-10/02) T. Raczek included a table showing the drop-off in performance between measureme; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00382.html (12,848 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: w8kc@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:29:59 +0000; This just warms my heart :-) Is it little wonder why I haven't replaced the old girl yet? A friend who lives not too far from me has the 781 and as recently as LAST NIGHT invited me over to use a "re; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00388.html (7,686 bytes)
5. [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:00:11 -0500; Terry's table is very useful. Another take on the same data can be found at: http://www.ringstad-radio.com/comparing_rigs.pdf Unfortunately, the RSGB data is not directly comparable to the ARRL's lab; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00394.html (7,934 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@serv.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:54:24 -0800; Are the Jupiter's close in specs anywhere published? How does it compare with the VI and the Orion? Curious minds want to know! Gee, for a single conversion IF, the K2 is certainly pushing the envelo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00461.html (7,280 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]