Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+and\s+Inrad\s+762\s+vs\s+Orion\s+II\s+CW\s+selectivity\s+and\s+tone\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+and\s+Inrad\s+762\s+vs\s+Orion\s+II\s+CW\s+selectivity\s+and\s+tone\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ORION and Inrad 762 vs Orion II CW selectivity and tone (score: 1): Author: "yahoo email" <barbiekenw@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:50:35 -0700; My Orion II is 2.059 software. The Orion (not Ver 2) is 1.372 software. But do not construe my comments as any kind of negative on the Orion II. It is fine. They are both fine. My comments are more a; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00243.html (7,504 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ORION and Inrad 762 vs Orion II CW selectivity and tone (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:45:18 -0500; K5WK/&: The Orion (not Ver 2) is 1.372 software. Ken I believe you mean 2.037j for Orion II, because 2.059d is the most recent V2 version for the original Orion. Orion II. It is fine. They are both f; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00262.html (8,350 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] ORION and Inrad 762 vs Orion II CW selectivity and tone (score: 1): Author: "yahoo email" <barbiekenw@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:25:18 -0700; for some time prefer 1.373b5 over 1.372, but the latter has nearly the same functionality (a major change in RF Gain and AGC Threshold integration was done at 1.372). If you are keeping both rigs, y; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00293.html (8,346 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]