Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+vs\.\s+Jupiter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+vs\.\s+Jupiter\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: junque <junque2@direcway.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:22:42 -0500; Gentlemen, After enjoying TT equipment for the past 30 years, but not being endowed with a sufficient income to purchase new equipment, I am the happy recipent of an inherited OMNI VI/opt1 transceive; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00455.html (7,865 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi_michael@excite.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:49:03 -0500 (EST); I called Ten Tec when I had an Omni 5, and it was my intent was to trade it in on a Jupiter. I was told by one of the Ten Tec staff that I would be happier if I kept what I had. I'm sure the Jupiter; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00457.html (8,761 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:20:28 -0800; Bill, The Omni VI does have a better receiver than the Jupiter, assuming you have a good selection of optional filters in it. However computer control with N4PY software is a lot of fun, if you enjoy; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00460.html (9,324 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:44:55 -0800; I used the Omni VI/opt1 and Jupiter alternately for about 4 years. It took 2 years for me to understand how to use the Jupiter succinctly so that I gradually found out how to use it best. I wound up; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00463.html (8,374 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Larry DiGioia <listacct@longwire.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:11:52 -0500; What you want is the Drake R8B. There's one available on a certain highly-regarded auction site right now for $700. -- Larry N8KU w w w . l o n g w i r e . c o m 100% CW 100% HF _____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00469.html (7,811 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:31:34 -0500; A Jupiter owner may not agree, but I would not let an Omni go for a Jupiter...ever! I did let my Omni V go to get an Omni VI+ I would not let the Omni VI+ go for any other rig. Not even an Orion. I'm; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00473.html (9,795 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: OTAKEBI@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 21:48:10 EST; I have a Ten Tec Corsair II and an OMNI V. They do all I need and more. Both rigs have all the filters. DSP units are on both made by Timewave. The Jupiter and Orion are great rigs if you like to loa; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00477.html (8,404 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Williams, Barry" <Barry.Williams@nov.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:31:08 -0600; Seconded on the Drake R-8B, great receiver, not quite up with the R-390A/Sherwood SE-3, but close, and much easier to use. After letting my first go, I got another within a couple of months, you can; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00487.html (9,138 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:11:52 -0500; I have an original Paragon and an ICOM R-71A. How does the Paragon compare with a Jupiter and the Drake R-8B? I also have an original Corsair and I like it because the receiver IF seems a bit quieter; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00532.html (10,026 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]