Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\/OMNI\s+VII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\/OMNI\s+VII\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:10:54 -0400; I'm thinking that a principal advantage of an OMNI VII over the VI Plus may be an improved NR feature. Anyone care to opine on the effectiveness of the OMNI VII's NR? Or any other advantages it may h; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00426.html (7,390 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Dave Humbertson <w3np@atlanticbb.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:51:11 -0400; I have both the VI plus and the Omni VII. I much prefer the way the NR works on the 6+ as opposed to the 7. With the 6 the signal/noise ratio seems to improve and the signals just jump right out of t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00427.html (8,486 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:25:03 -0400; Good question, John. And very difficult question to answer because it turns on a subjective, personal judgment whether the NR feature is sufficiently good or effective to justify upgrading rigs. Sid; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00477.html (16,782 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:47:48 -0500; I've been through all this.... I ordered a OMNI-VII with optional 300 and 500 Hz filters on the 30 day trial, set it up along side my OMNI-VI+ with 1.8 KHz, 500, 250 and 1.8 (N1)- 500 (N2) filters, u; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00479.html (18,807 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: "Mike Barrell - WB9DLC" <wb9dlc@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:06:57 -0400; First : great reply from Richards. Second : I replaced my Omni VI+ with an Omni VII due to a fatal lightning strike I loved the VI-plus and I missed her for a while - but I have learned to like the V; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00483.html (9,960 bytes)
6. [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:19:55 -0500; I asked a question under this topic about the NR function on the OMNI VII back in September. I was remiss in not thanking K8JHR, W3NP. AB9M, and WB9DLC for very helpful replies at that time. Thank yo; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00037.html (8,980 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <ko7i@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:42:54 -0800; John, Thanks for posting this message. I put in a little over 5 hrs this weekend myself and left the event with nearly the same impression. I run a OMNI 6 Opt 3 that has the INRAD roofing filter mod.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00055.html (10,908 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:30:34 +0000; There are different Inrad filters available for both the roofing filter (600hz) and 9Mhz i.f. (400hz) that have a lower center frequency for those who prefer a lower pitched sidetone. I can vouch tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00057.html (8,331 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <ko7i@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:53:23 -0800; Barry, I have no doubt that the INRAD filters work very well. I would love to replace all of the TT CW filters in my 6 with INRAD's. Only one thing keeping me from doing that - the war department! :); /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00070.html (7,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]