Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\-VI\s+Transverter\s+output\s+mod\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\-VI\s+Transverter\s+output\s+mod\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Transverter output mod? (score: 1): Author: wwalsh@intac.com (Warren Walsh); Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 17:11:37 -0400 (EDT); Hi everyone, My question to the group is, has anyone on the reflector modified their OMNI-VI to provide a low power output for a transverter? Thanks Warren Walsh - K2BM (ex N2BCC) wwalsh@intac.com (h; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-05/msg00061.html (7,131 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Transverter output mod? (score: 1): Author: aas@vectorbd.vivanet.com (Al Scanandoah); Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 16:50:21 +0000 (UTC); Although this doesn't exactly answer the question, I've had excellent results running a transverter with my Omni V by building up an attenuator to place between the rig's output and the transverter's; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-05/msg00073.html (7,662 bytes)
3. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Transverter output mod? (score: 1): Author: jmlowman@ix.netcom.com (Jim Lowman); Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 10:07:38 -0700; I understood that the OMNI-VI power output was variable, down to 5 watts or so. Since low-power HF operation is one of my interests, I hope that I have not misunderstood. 73 de Jim - KF6CR -- FAQ on; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-05/msg00074.html (7,332 bytes)
4. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Transverter output mod? (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 12:23:52 -0700; I have checked my OMNI-6 and it goes down to the milliwatt stage. (I suspect the imd goes to pot down there, tho) It actually goes so low, that I can't measure it with any accuracy. The OMNI-V only w; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-05/msg00077.html (8,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]