Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMN\s+VI\s+must\s+have\s+a\s+very\s+quiet\s+LO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMN\s+VI\s+must\s+have\s+a\s+very\s+quiet\s+LO\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMN VI must have a very quiet LO (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:50:52 -0500; Thanks for the responses. Re the "1980s" design, I have an older ARRL handbook c. 2000 that goes into the design of the OMNI VI in quite a lot of detail, including the unique LO design. I knew it was; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00125.html (7,213 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OMN VI must have a very quiet LO (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:05:12 +0000; I use similar filtering plus an Inrad 600hz roofing filter. Yes, I definiterly also use LP (600). I'm not sure about ATTN - I tend to think that leaving it ON and lowering RF Gain will result in lowe; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00127.html (8,391 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OMN VI must have a very quiet LO (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:49:07 -0600; I tend to agree with Barry. The ATTN improves dynamic range while lowering RF Gain improves S/N ratio. I'm amazed at many local ops, not in a contest or strong signal area, which run with the ATTN on; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00128.html (9,593 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]