Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMIN\s+VII\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: Doug S <nn9s@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Here is a posting from the Omin VII group I wrote to a fellow member I would like to share with this group. Thank you Doug NN9S Eric, 1st I am sad to hear the troubles with two ORION II units. I have
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00075.html (9,056 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 14:33:33 -0500
To Doug's comments I add............. I have been a Tentec user since the late 70's. I've had the Delta, a couple of earlier Omni's, a Paragon, later an Omni VI Plus, a Paragon II, another Omni VI Pl
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00079.html (14,373 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 20:12:22 +0000
I appreciate the Omni VII's virtues being extolled in this thread. But I'm not buying the Orion "is not a radio most would enjoy using on a casual basis. It is a serious high performance contest radi
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00081.html (9,139 bytes)

4. [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:17:09 -0800 (PST)
I might add the group I normally operate with on 75m ssb is VERY MUCH anti Ten Tec and I have turned some heads with this radio. ** Dunno how you could turn their heads... The Omni VII audio is not 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00105.html (7,386 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:34:12 +0000
Heck, I'm still trying to figure out how a group is anti-Ten-Tec. I don't have a Kenwood rig but that doesn't mean I'm anti-Kenwood. It has been my experience that almost no one can tell what brand S
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00108.html (7,679 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Gates, KD3JF" <pearly732003@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:31:23 -0800 (PST)
Riley changed his mind. He is not retiring. Paul, KD3JF Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com> wrote: I might add the group I normally operate with on 75m ssb is VERY MUCH anti Ten Tec and I have turne
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00111.html (8,041 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:09:08 -0500
Yo The Omni VII is great! Riley is reconsidering retirement. Hopefully, he will stick around for a few more years Ron K3MIY I might add the group I normally operate with on 75m ssb is VERY MUCH anti
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00112.html (8,135 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:19:42 -0500
Some things just defy explanation, Dave. Back when Ten-Tec still had a dealer network and the Argosy & Argosy II were out, there was a fellow here in Pittsburgh who started a rumor that the Argosy's
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00115.html (9,946 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:55:17 -0600
I too observe a lot of negative "Tentec ism" on the bands. I guess there may a jealous or envious streak in some folks, specially those that want to be like everyone else and own one of the "big 3".
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00127.html (12,770 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:56:25 -0500
Dave Sez: I can't think of one single thing that doesn't generate opposite opinions, given enough opinions and TenTec couldn't be any different. I'm a minor player in the radio arena but I've had sev
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00129.html (8,827 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:34:56 -0600
From: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net> Reply-To: Gary@doctorgary.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> To: tentec@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII Date: Mon, 05 N
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00131.html (9,071 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:15:25 -0600
SGC is just a small niche player in the market. It also looks like Elecraft is set to emerge as another important U.S. player, now that the K3 is shipping. I would rank them much higher than SGC in i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00132.html (9,066 bytes)

13. [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 05:33:33 -0800 (PST)
What Rick, are you saying that my O2 is not a mobile rig? OK levity aside, I agree with you... I would comment that SGC may be small but their 500 watt amp, is of the highest world class quality... W
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00135.html (8,671 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Art Lewis" <wa8vsj@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:54:14 -0500
Dave I really enjoyed your comments and I think all of have had that same experience. Why anyone would intentionally knock TT or any company that they really have no experience with is beyond my comp
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00138.html (12,369 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:06:25 -0600
That raised voltage gets some more power out, but it adds to the voltage stress on the active devices which is made rapidly worse by a mismatched load. Trouble with driving all amplifiers to more tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00140.html (10,341 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 20:36:09 -0600
I agree on the SGC500, Denny. It is probably the best thing going in its class, now that Henry has ceased making their SS series of amps. Though not built as well, I would prefer the SS-750 HF over t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00144.html (9,947 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu