Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+O\s+II\s+development\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+O\s+II\s+development\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] O II development (score: 1): Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:44:48 -0800; T Perry and Co. I must say this is not a very inconsiderate term to use for fellow amateurs who make a legitimate complaint about the lack of OII development. This is a far cry from the treatment you; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00088.html (8,047 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] O II development (score: 1): Author: <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:53:46 -0500; Ah ............. but will you buy the Olive III and finally the Oxford IV ? They will be great " O " 2 ? Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00091.html (9,652 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] O II development (score: 1): Author: Douglas Shock <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:17:28 -0700; Well stated Doug! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00092.html (9,626 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]