Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+TT\s+Amp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+TT\s+Amp\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Mr Mike <kf8zn@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:16:03 -0700 (PDT); It's Cute, but bottom line....it's a 100 watt amplifier................Why Bother ???? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00094.html (6,920 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Shawn Upton <kb1ckt@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:02:06 -0700 (PDT); For their new 539 QRP transciever--but I don't see a 539 on their websight. ? Shawn Upton, KB1CKT NAQCC 4723 ________________________________ From: Mr Mike <kf8zn@yahoo.com> To: "tentec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00096.html (8,005 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:17:59 +0000; The amp is for any rig, just keep power below 20 watts. It will mate with the 539 when it is released 73 Good DX KC4ATU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00097.html (8,438 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Paul Gentry <phgentry@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:31:17 -0400; to go QRO. -- Paul Gentry K4BWG _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00099.html (7,792 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:59:27 -0400; for Mr Mike and others It's a harbinger, a warning of the future to come. TT may not be able to build large gear, due to pricing concerns down the road. Ron K3MIY -- This mail sent through CSOnline W; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00100.html (10,106 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Shawn Upton <kb1ckt@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT); Interesting. I have been thinking of tossing the FT-817 into the car, but 5W into a low-efficency antenna has deterred me thus far. This amp is too big for that job. I didn't look to see how it was; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00103.html (9,321 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:53:03 -0400; Back in the 1980's, I used to run an HW-8 mobile. This is a two watt CW only direct conversion radio. For a stretch of time, almost everyday I would work a European while driving to work. I had a hom; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00109.html (9,777 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Jim Miller K4SQR <k4sqr@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:07:44 -0400; I am certain the new 100 amp has been developed due to hundreds, if not thousands of requests, from Argonaut 509 and later QRP models needing a little more oomph at times. I am certain some members k; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00121.html (8,804 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:59:56 -0400; The new amp seems to meet the same basic need as the neat old TenTec 405 amplifier that mates so well with the 509 and other QRP rigs as well. 72 de Chas W3KC Jim Miller K4SQR posted: _______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00131.html (8,799 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:44:53 -0400; Here is a thought , May be Ten Tec is planning to come out with a 1500 watt solid state amp using the new mosfet parts( sorry I am not very knowledgeable in electronics ) now available . Maybe this q; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00134.html (9,137 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Jeff Davis <stuckbit@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:25:11 -0400; I think their strategy is to offer a QRP transceiver (the new Argo VI) with a matching optional 100W PA. If the Argo VI comes in at under a $900 then they can offer a QRP/100W station for around $160; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00136.html (11,114 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:38:19 -0500 (CDT); I think you may be on to something Jeff. It's pretty clear that there is a market for a QRP radio that can be, in one fashion or another, upgraded to 100 W out. Elecraft is selling quite a few K2/10'; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00137.html (11,681 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:20:47 -0400; ___________________________________________- I get your point, and while I am not pushing Kenwood gear here, I note the TS-590s meets the same description for around $1550. Just adding fuel to you fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00140.html (8,921 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:13:00 -0700; I'm inclined to agree with you and Jeff. As far as buying the 539+418, one scenario that I can see is $$$ up front. Assuming that the final price is around $800-900 for each, it may be easier on a li; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00141.html (11,720 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:58:49 -0400 (EDT); I'm somewhat puzzled by why TT discontinued the Argonaut V not too long ago, and the 405 QRP amplifier looong ago, now introduces an amp (I know the new one is 100W vs 50W )and soon an Argonaut VI. S; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00143.html (9,296 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:09:16 -0500; I would suppose that the 405 amps are hard to support with replacement parts now. The packaging was also dated. There have been many queries on QRP reflectors for sources for a 5 watt to 100 watt amp; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00144.html (9,341 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:13:41 -0400; The 405 amp was killed by the FCC cb amp ban way back when. The new amp,and the new rules, allow the use of low RF input (qrp level.) It has a microprocessor that monitors the input freq and will ins; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00145.html (9,888 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:51:41 -0400; The packaging was also dated. I sorta think the new transceiver comes in an outdated package... I am sure it saves money to use an old case, but I think a new rig deserves a new face. It looks like t; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00146.html (9,726 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:33:54 +0200; Curt, The ArgoV was great in the states but pretty much a flop here in Europe. The receiver couldn't cope with the strong shortwave broadcast stations we have. Its weak IP3 made it useless on 40m and; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00148.html (10,452 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:12:59 -0400; Russell and Others As I understand it, the reason for discontinuing the V was that the supplier of the meters was no longer making them. While reading this thread, I looked over at my LDG AT200Pro. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00152.html (10,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]