Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+N1eu\s+Orion\s+static\s+Redux\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+N1eu\s+Orion\s+static\s+Redux\!\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:21:38 -0500; Barry: One thing that bothered me about the Orion was how the agc responded to static. I've noticed this characteristic in a few other receivers where a burst of static tends to totally mute the rece; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00469.html (11,101 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:30:02 -0800; Steve, did you adjust the threshold? I used my Orion is a thunderstorm during the IOTA contest last summer and compared it to the TS-850. After adjusting the AGC, it was fantastic, hearing things whi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00470.html (11,866 bytes)
3. [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:19:12 -0800 (PST); My experience is that for CW the hang time set to zero will eliminate the problem of a character element being deleted due to a static burst. I have also been playing with the decay v threshold with; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00472.html (7,246 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:21:41 -0500; Yes of course I adjusted the "threshold". I spent hours fiddling with all the agc adjustments. I even followed the detailed instructions someone seems to have dedicated their life to and posted on so; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00473.html (13,197 bytes)
5. [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:03:15 -0800 (PST); Steve, I'm glad you adjusted threshold. My comment was not to you particularly but about my experience with the Orion, to the thread in general. You never seem to miss an opportunity to knock the Ori; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00475.html (9,184 bytes)
6. [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:49:30 -0500; elements won't be lost to static induced gain reduction in the AGC. If you set the hang to anything except zero you run the risk of some crashes activating the AGC enough when copying some weak signa; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00478.html (9,648 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:19:51 -0500; Lee: You Orion owners are far to sensitive. I will "knock" any rig I please including the ones I own (which I have done often). Yes, I own a microchirping Omni VI! I did manage to fix that problem ho; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00480.html (11,580 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@lectrosonics.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:59:13 -0700; I've done a lot of listening to the N2XE low-power beacon lately and it is amazing to hear Orion extract the signal from noise as you adjust Hang upwards. If you don't believe this, I would suggest t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00499.html (8,366 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:21:32 EST; I am confused - if you adjust the hang and delay upwards, doesn't noise cause the AGC to attenuate the signal longer? I am out of town and don't have my Orion in front of me but I do remember Field D; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00500.html (7,707 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:35:45 -0500; Buck Yes you are correct. For noisy conditions you want a very fast decay, the same as pushing the "fast AGC" button on a normal rig. There's all kinds of fuzzy agc logic floating around these days.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00501.html (8,587 bytes)
11. RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@lectrosonics.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:49:58 -0700; Sure, static crashes cause very weak signals to be suppressed during the AGC hang, but in moderate noise conditions the intelligibility (copy) seems easier, at least for me. BTW, my comfort point is; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00502.html (9,639 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:42:04 -0500; Yes and no, depends on noise. For the "background" type of noise use hand time > 0 and slow decay. For strong impulse noise and strong atmospheric crashes using zero hang time and fast decay in order; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00562.html (8,176 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:07:54 -0500; Background noise? Cheeesh...What's that supposed to be? Is that like the xyl or something? Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Sinisa Hristov" <shristov@ptt.yu> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent:; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00588.html (9,157 bytes)
14. [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! (score: 1): Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 14:27:56 -0800 (PST); I've been working with Carl on a couple of ideas for his Orion program, and he has brought out the AGC decay control on a slider. Now you can adjust the decay and threshold for any of 5 of the 6 ACG; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00646.html (9,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]