Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Looking\s+for\s+Omni\-546C\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Looking\s+for\s+Omni\-546C\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: <nz7c@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:02:35 -0500; Looking for Omni 546C with all filters in top "collector" condition - VFO as well. Must be in superb cosmetic and operating shape. Please email replies off line. Thanks. _____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00593.html (6,868 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:56:11 -0800 (PST); Tim, After you find that Omni-546C, try it on CW with your Idiom Press SCAF-1 audio filter. I built the kit, you can get them wired. It sweetens up the sidetone, takes out the pop, and leaves more be; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00599.html (7,237 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: <nz7c@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:13:08 -0500; Don - You must have read my mind. My SCAF filter and, of course, my Logi-Key are sitting here waiting. I suspect the SCAF with an Omni-C would be a very sweet sounding CW machine. 73/Tim Tim, After y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00600.html (8,114 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: k2zn@rochester.rr.com; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:24:20 -0500; An even better implementation of the SCAF filter would be to get it within the audio AGC loop. I set up my Omni A that way with a Datong FL3 - outstanding! Al, K2ZN __________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00601.html (7,355 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:29:26 -0500; I tried putting a DSP filter inside the agc loop on a Triton and it made the pop problem a 100 times worse due to the log delay. Don't count on that working. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: <; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00603.html (8,273 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:39:45 -0800 (PST); Hi Al, I noticed that during the 10 meter contest weekend, there was some visible pumping. I was pleased to read in the OMNI C manual that the rig's audio filter is within the AGC. So I set that in t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00610.html (8,287 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: k2zn@rochester.rr.com; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:45:44 -0500; Yup, I've had dismal results with DSP boxes as well. They provide hundreds of microseconds of delay, if not milliseconds; ADC bit noise as well. The FL3 delay is in the tens of microseconds; comparis; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00611.html (9,273 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:51:13 -0500; Just curios, what is the bandwidth at -6 and -60 dB? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00623.html (7,727 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]