- 1. [TenTec] Looking backward? (score: 1)
- Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:00:16 -0500
- Even as I am considering getting the new INRAD "roofing" filter setup for my OMNI VI, I can't help wondering: doesn't this improvement represent a step backward in terms of technology? Adding analog
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00428.html (7,470 bytes)
- 2. RE: [TenTec] Looking backward? (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:54:10 -0800
- John, I don't see it that way at all. I think we're a long ways away from having a purely digital radio. For the next several years to come we will have hybrid radios combining the advantages of anal
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00431.html (8,794 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Looking backward? (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:05:24 -0800
- The roofing filter mod does not give up any modes at all. It is a simple 4 pole filter switched in/out of the line according to the NAR filter switch positions. But the point is well taken, the origi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00433.html (9,506 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TenTec] Looking backward? (score: 1)
- Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:14:14 -0500
- Rick You're not giving up any modes for a roofing filter. Everything still works as it always did. The Omni VI never had AM anyway. FM still uses the wide filter. Steve ______________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00435.html (10,617 bytes)
- 5. RE: [TenTec] Looking backward? (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:26:57 -0800
- Thanks for clarification, Steve. Rick Rick You're not giving up any modes for a roofing filter. Everything still works as it always did. The Omni VI never had AM anyway. FM still uses the wide filter
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00438.html (11,328 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu