Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Lightning\s+protection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Lightning\s+protection\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: feutz@wctc.net (Ron Feutz); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:50:04 -0600; Gentlemen, Lightning season is here. If you want to do it right, go to this link. I make my living as a two-way land mobile dealer and tower operator. We use polyphaser products exclusively, and have; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00596.html (7,297 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:02:50 -0500; Hi Ron and all, I have a slightly different perspective on this. While I agree the best practice is to disconnect antennas, the real secret is in cable routing and grounding, not in lighting suppres; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00609.html (10,033 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: feutz@wctc.net (Ron Feutz); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:52:07 -0600; Hi Tom and reflectees, Hi Ron and all, I have a slightly different perspective on this. While I agree the best practice is to disconnect antennas, the real secret is in cable routing and grounding. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00613.html (7,143 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 21:06:11 -0500; My point wasn't to encourage or discourage using an arrestor, but rather that the effects of protection by adding such devices are largely exaggerated. There also can be damaging effects, if we run; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00675.html (7,381 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 19:20:23 -0500; Sent from my iPad I like you Bob...... But we will never agree on that one.... Too many documents and industry standards say and do otherwise.... First line of defense is definitely outside but not c; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00315.html (10,841 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 19:33:33 -0500; Cecil: I don't have a problem with your concept as long as the outside work is done first and correct. That says the outside system must be bonded to the AC mains. Failure to do this will then tie th; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00316.html (12,783 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:52:41 -0700 (PDT); Cecil, I have to agree with you on this. I did a 7 channel trunking system for our plant in Oak Ridge, TN and we had copper sheet on the floor of the shack, a halo loop made from 1" copper pipe arou; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00319.html (13,099 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:08:40 -0500; Do you believe any ham will go to that level or can afford to do so. There are less expensive methods that work equally well if and only if done correctly. 73 Bob, K4TAX Cecil, I have to agree with y; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00320.html (14,668 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:23:37 -0500; No probably not but many of the principals can be scaled down as long as the basic rules are not ignored. And you are right it's relatively expensive and it won't work you any more DX for the money s; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00326.html (17,420 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]