Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+LDG\s+tuner\s+install\/first\s+impressions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+LDG\s+tuner\s+install\/first\s+impressions\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] LDG tuner install/first impressions (score: 1): Author: Randy K4QO <k4qo@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:50:25 -0500; I spent most of today (Sunday) removing the TenTec supplied auto-tuner and putting the LDG in its place. ( a couple of times actually - not fun!) For now, I'm keeping the TenTec model. Here's why...; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00529.html (10,508 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner install/first impressions (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:25:47 -0600; On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:50:25 -0500 Randy K4QO <k4qo@earthlink.net> writes: The TT tuner seems to "start" at the last tune setting and it usually improves on the Did you try doing the "long push" on t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00534.html (7,406 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner install/first impressions (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:39:45 -0800; Is it possible that the LDG is using its own internal SWR bridge and that might not be in agreement with the TT? IOW the LDG 'thinks' it has nearly a 1:1 match, but the TT is showing something differ; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00539.html (13,108 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner install/first impressions (score: 1): Author: w2yj@highstream.net; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:11:50 -0500; I have a O2 with the TT internal tuner. I explained to LDG before telling TT that I wanted a internal tuner what my antennas were and they said, "their internal tuner would not handle my antennas" so; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00558.html (8,256 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner install/first impressions (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:31:52 -0800 (PST); The internal tuner is fast and just too convenient to use. At first I was disappointed that it does not have memories but at this point is seems irrelevant and based on comments I have read possibly; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00565.html (9,818 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner install/first impressions (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:30:57 -0800 (PST); The internal tuner is fast and just too convenient to use. At first I was disappointed that it does not have memories but at this point is seems irrelevant and based on comments I have read possibly; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00622.html (9,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]