Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Kachina\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: wa2tti@worldlynx.net (Jerry Harley)
Date: Wed Apr 23 09:20:16 2003
Does anyone know of a Kachina group, like the Jupiter group? Jerry
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00625.html (6,334 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: w3frg@comcast.net (w3frg)
Date: Wed Apr 23 18:17:12 2003
There is a Kachina group on QTH at : http://mailman.qth.net/ scan down and look for Kachina. TT is also there as well as on Contesting, plus hundreds of others. GL and 73s Tom W3FRG
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00642.html (6,402 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: w2agn@w2agn.net (W2AGN)
Date: Wed Apr 23 18:17:23 2003
Yes, there is a Kachina reflector on QTH.NET. Go to http://www.qth.net -- +-++-++-++-++-+ John L. Sielke +-++-++-++-++-+ Ex-K3HLU,TF2WKT,W7JEF,W4MPC,N4JS
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00643.html (6,596 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: rthorne@tcac.net (Richard Thorne)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:02:28 -0500
I sure hate it when a manufacturer leaves the market. Reminds me of when Heath, Drake and Collins left the amateur market. The 505dsp sure is a fun radio. I bought mine specifically for remote contro
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00179.html (8,353 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: disorder@fastlane.net (disorder@fastlane.net)
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 22:02:10 -0500 (CDT)
Jack, thanks for the information. I waited to see what Dayton would bring from TenTec but that turned out to be nothing from the standpoint of my needs. I am certain that TenTec has more in mind than
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00375.html (10,718 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: disorder@fastlane.net (Corboy-Poteet)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 22:31:55 -0500 (CDT)
OK, I read the Kachina 505 review in the May issue of QST. Looks nifty (as expected) but with specs that, in general, don't seem to quite measure up to comparably priced Yaesu/Kenwood/Icom gear. Howe
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00216.html (7,659 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: talbot@kmrmail.kmr.ll.mit.edu (George Arthur Talbot)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 98 16:08:21+120
Mike, <snip> I heard that the Drake R4 with all the mods was one of the best receivers around, solid state or other wise. At least that is what I have heard. George V73GT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00217.html (7,160 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: pinskeep@iglou.com (Peter Inskeep)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 08:59:45 -0400 (EDT)
Mike, TenTec demo'd a small rig that was controlled thru a PC at Dayton last year. If I recall correctly, it was receive only at the time. I have heard nothing further of it since. It was not nearly
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00220.html (7,925 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Kachina (score: 1)
Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:00:07, -0500
Hi Mike, The Kachina looks like a nifty rig...but Why buy a radio in a computer and give up a radio in a box with the tuning knobs and switches we are all used to.. With the OMNI VI+ you can have bot
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00231.html (7,396 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu