Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+K3\s+vs\s+TenTec\s+\-\s+opinion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+K3\s+vs\s+TenTec\s+\-\s+opinion\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] K3 vs TenTec - opinion (score: 1): Author: "Zivney, Terry L." <00tlzivney@bsu.edu>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:28:21 -0400; I agree with Rick that the SWR foldback on the non- Ten-Tec rigs is a real annoyance. Motorola and TRW rated their RF transistors to work FB with a 30:1 SWR with no need for foldback. A properly desi; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00447.html (8,957 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] K3 vs TenTec - opinion (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:44:58 -0500; My conclusion below: I thought I had the perfect solution until Terry just posted his post. My idea: Purchase a naked K3/10 kit with no options and try it for a month of two. If it works for me, I ad; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00450.html (7,443 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] K3 vs TenTec - opinion (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:42:25 -0400; it. W5TM in OK has one. He finished in the Top 10 SOHP of the recent Topband Distance Challenge: http://web.jzap.com/k7rat/2009_Stew.htm Other K3s in the Top 10 that I know of are: CE1/K7CA, K3ZM, my; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00452.html (7,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]