- 1. [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@houston.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:18:51 -0500
- Planning to replace my Icom 718 with one of these, wondering whether added $1k cost of the Omni VII warranted. I have no plans to remotely control, is performance significantly different? 73, Curt KB
- /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00144.html (7,199 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:51:29 -0400
- Hi Curt, It has been my experience that the Omni VII is more sensitive and more immune to adjacent signals than my previous rig, an FT1000MP MrkV Field with roofing filter. I've used the Omni VII in
- /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00147.html (8,196 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:14:59 -0700
- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00149.html (8,014 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: JOHN <ku3g@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
- Just look at the figures in QST......you won't go wrong wioth this rig and also you'll have the legendery Ten Tec service. 73 john ku3g Denton <denton@oregontrail.net> wrote: 718 won't hold a candle
- /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00150.html (7,979 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:58:43 -0500
- YES, significantly better (in favor of the O7). Planning to replace my Icom 718 with one of these, wondering whether added $1k cost of the Omni VII warranted. I have no plans to remotely control, is
- /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00157.html (7,825 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu