Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Is\s+Jupiter\s+better\s+than\s+the\s+Icom\s+746\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Is\s+Jupiter\s+better\s+than\s+the\s+Icom\s+746\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: joe_word@yahoo.com (Joe Word); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 13:46:59 -0800 (PST); John, I did own an Icom IC-746 and now own a Jupiter. Compared them side-by-side for about a month. I decided to keep the Jupiter and sell the IC-746 because the Jupiter was much quieter on receive.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00014.html (9,024 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 18:03:51 -0500; <snip> <snip> OOoooooh, nooooo. It sounds like Joe is saying that the Jupiter is more susceptible to RF than the ICOM. I hope this is not a portent of things to come with the Orion... 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00020.html (9,804 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: bstephens1@mindspring.com (robert k stephens); Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 20:07:17 -0500; Joe You experienced the Jupiter as hearing less noise. Did the Jupiter detect as many or more weak signals as the 746 when compared side by side? 73 Bob KB1CIW; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00029.html (10,218 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: bstephens1@mindspring.com (robert k stephens); Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 20:19:11 -0500; Carter, Don't worry -be happy. It is my impression that most Ten Tecs are more susceptable to RF than most Japanese rigs. (I don't know why) This is not really a problem. I have little actual experie; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00030.html (10,553 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:19:57 -0600; I hardly think so. I do not hear others reporting any Jupiter RF problems. ANY rig interfaced to a computer can have multiple paths of signal return that can present problems with unbalanced, or in t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00031.html (9,248 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: ve3ios@servers.ca (Jeff Peacock); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:31:32 -0500; I had RF problems with my Jupiter. I had 450 ohm ladder line coming into the shack to the back ot the ten tec 238 tuner. Could not get my D104 mic to work and my SWR/ Power meter was way out of wack; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00033.html (10,263 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:33:01 -0600; Joe, Did you have any RF problem with the Jupiter? Your statement that the Icom 746 would be less prone needs explanation/clarification/ back up. Thanks and 73, Stuart K5KVH; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00036.html (8,145 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:40:29 -0600; Jeff, thanks for the account, however your RF problem sounds like RF got into the active preamp in the base of the D104 mike NOT the radio necessarily. This is a known problem of the amplified microp; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00038.html (9,217 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: joe_word@yahoo.com (Joe Word); Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 12:29:20 -0800 (PST); Answers to some questions asked: 1. The IC-746 and Jupiter would receive a week signal about the same, the 746 would have much more white noise. The IC-746 has more noise with the NR on than the Jupi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00123.html (9,554 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: KB2HUK@aol.com (KB2HUK@aol.com); Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 14:24:01 EST; Hello I know we are all fans of Ten Tec here. However I have a chance to trade my icom 746 for a jupiter and I would like to know what you guys think. I am interested in the better receiver primarily; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg01006.html (7,102 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: benk8dit@serv.net (Ben Kadish K8DIT); Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:09:20 -0800; Ive played with an Icom 746 and if you are used to Icoms and like them, keep it. If you think that TT has a better overall approach to design and philosophy, I do, you'd be correct and so welcome abo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg01009.html (8,193 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 20:56:54 -0500; Give me the name of the fellow willing to take on an IC-746. I've got some high ground in the Everglades to sell him. Mike to think. radio in to having; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg01011.html (7,696 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1): Author: wa2tti@worldlynx.net (Jerry Harley); Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 10:48:54 -0500; The Jupiter wins, I owned a 746 and I had it the same time as the Jupiter. I was able to swap the 746 for a FT847( boy did I get the better end of the deal), which is a nice radio but again the Jupit; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg01016.html (6,909 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]