Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\s+filter\s+for\s+the\s+OMNI\s+6\+\s+vs\s+TenTec\s+filter\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\s+filter\s+for\s+the\s+OMNI\s+6\+\s+vs\s+TenTec\s+filter\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Inrad filter for the OMNI 6+ vs TenTec filter ? (score: 1): Author: DK2GZ@aol.com (DK2GZ@aol.com); Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:30:22 EST; Hello i am looking for someone who have experience with the inrad filters instead the original tentec filters. I think the original tentec filters not as sharp as they could be. I there anybody who u; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00361.html (7,042 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Inrad filter for the OMNI 6+ vs TenTec filter ? (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:54:19 -0600; The original Tentec filters ARE as sharp as they need to be while not ringing on static and ignition noise and high speed CW. Sharper filters may not perform as well. I know some sharper filters from; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00362.html (7,152 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]