Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\/TenTec\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\/TenTec\s+Filters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Inrad/TenTec Filters (score: 1): Author: rp.tyler@worldnet.att.net (Rick Tyler); Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 08:48:27 -0400; I'm sitting here during the CQ WPX CW contest waiting for the thunderstorms to pass through (and the computer will be shut down shortly). . . and I've been having fun with the OMNI V and have been th; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00528.html (7,057 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Inrad/TenTec Filters (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 08:58:13 -0400; I've never tried an Inrad in a TT rig. They may be a little more narrow but I would be concerned with how they respond to band noise. The Omni V is a pleasant rig to listen to and it would be a shame; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00529.html (8,046 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Inrad/TenTec Filters (score: 1): Author: ke5c@hot.rr.com (John, ke5c); Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 12:35:43 -0500; thunderstorms I've the 400 the difference? I find the really narrow filters not to my liking, and during contests, you will miss a number of folks calling you a few hundred HZ off frequency, so I ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00535.html (7,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]