Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+2\.4khz\s+10\s+Pole\s+Filter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+2\.4khz\s+10\s+Pole\s+Filter\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 16:14:41 -0700 (PDT); Hi All, I installed the INRAD 2.4khz 10 pole filter in the standard first (non-switched) 9 Mhz position, replacing the Ten Tec 2.4khz filter. I find that the INRAD filter has less loss than the Ten T; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00048.html (7,988 bytes)
2. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 14:11:19 -1000; I just tried Barry's suggested test. Result: No problem here, hooray! But, wait, just realized my set up is different, or at least Barry's is different from what I thought George at INRAD had in mind; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00049.html (9,546 bytes)
3. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 17:18:01 -0700 (PDT); Wow - didn't take long for Jim to cut to the chase Imp't question as Jim points out is: Is the INRAD 756 okay for the first 9Mhz slot? Also need to verify what I saw - can someone else slip a 756 in; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00050.html (11,796 bytes)
4. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 14:54:40 -1000; Hi Ten Tec gang, Thanks for all your comments and mail regarding my now "extra" Omni IF filters. Yes, I now have six of them in the drawer!! But, will hang onto them for awhile until I have a chance; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00051.html (8,413 bytes)
5. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: k7kj@teleport.com (Greg Hodsdon); Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 21:22:18 -0700; Hi Barry: I've had the Inrad 756 (2.4khz/10pole) filter installed in the first IF of my Omni 6+ since March and have noted no RF gain feedback problems at all during operation. I just rechecked per y; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00052.html (8,035 bytes)
6. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 04:40:18 -0700 (PDT); Thanks to Greg for the info on his success with the 756. To make a long story short, I just rechecked the Omni this morning and the feedback with the 756 at full rf throttle is gone. My apologies for; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00053.html (9,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]