Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+IMD\s+Measurements\s+\-\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Roofing\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+IMD\s+Measurements\s+\-\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Roofing\s+Filters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Omni VI Roofing Filters (score: 1): Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:34:58 -0800; My discussions with George (W2VJN) at InRad suggest that an Omni VI+ with the new (soon to be out) InRad roofing filter may be a worthy competitor when it comes to IMD dynamic range (even stock it's; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00893.html (7,769 bytes)
2. [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Omni VI Roofing Filters (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:16:19 -0500; the new (soon to be out) InRad roofing filter may be a worthy competitor when it comes to IMD dynamic range (even stock it's not too shabby). George indicated that "the improvement for close in signa; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00898.html (9,513 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Omni VI Roofing Filters (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:37:58 -0500; Yes, 600hz for CW is correct. At least that is what I have ordered for my Plus. George also mentioned in a telephone conversation that he had tried building a roofing for the Icom IC-781 but could ne; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00899.html (10,725 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]