- 1. Re: [TenTec] IC7300 (score: 1)
- Author: gunnerjuulnyholm@me.com
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:54:04 +0200
- Maybe I missed it, but the IC7300 lacks at least some roofing filters and a full size second receiver like the RS366. What a blessing it is to be able to operate on two frequencies on a busy band or
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00229.html (6,857 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] IC7300 (score: 1)
- Author: gunnerjuulnyholm@me.com
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:02:30 +0200
- Hi Rick. The IC7300 may be a fine rig, but its lack of serious front end selectivity and two receivers makes it operationally second class, however cheap. 73 Gunner/OZ6NF ____________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00234.html (7,409 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] IC7300 (score: 1)
- Author: gunnerjuulnyholm@me.com
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:30:14 +0200
- Agree, Rick. My O2 is actually a SDR rig with a front end with roofing filtering (IF-SDR). That front end selectivity and its dual rxs sure makes it expensive, but also in a class not obtainable (now
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00258.html (7,846 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] IC7300 (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:09:37 -0400
- I think the 16-bit ADC equipped direct sampling ANAN and Flex 6K receivers give up nothing to the O2/K3s. FWIW, I've compared them all. It's a matter of ergonomic preference as far as I'm concerned.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00260.html (8,959 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] IC7300 (score: 1)
- Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:28:33 +0200
- Barry, I'm not sure if the 6300 (entry level) is in that class. It does not have the front bandpass filters that the 6500 and 6700 have. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) I think the 16-bit A
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00262.html (9,595 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu