Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Topband\:\s+More\s+About\s+Clix\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Topband\:\s+More\s+About\s+Clix\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: feutz@wctc.net (Ron Feutz); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:29:45 -0600; How about this, guys? I have always been under the impression that my signal was clean and the Yaesu guys were screwing up the bands. Ron - WA9IRV Omni 6+ To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00540.html (11,890 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:49:30 -0600; The Icom IC-756PRO has rise and fall times on the keying waveform selectable from 2 ms to 8 ms. I have verified by scope examination of the r-f output waveform that these numbers apply to the actual; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00541.html (8,764 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A Calvin); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:21:49 -0600; Hmmm.... This doesn't match the ARRL/QST Labs results as printed in their review of the VI+. The keying waveshape was textbook perfect. In monitoring my own signal both in my shack and at a friend's; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00543.html (13,850 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:12:47 -0500; Since you brought it up; Is there any test equipment that would show "microchirp"? It's easy to hear but how about viewing it on a scope? Steve Ellington N4LQ To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00553.html (15,322 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:49:24 -0500; You can't. In fact, I know of no electronic instrument capable of reasonably detecting it. Sometimes the ear is the best judge. The keyed waveform oscilloscope display has no association with frequen; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00558.html (17,076 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: wg6h@pacbell.net (Bill Miner); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:59:33 -0800; Hello Ten Tekies, The bandwidth of a CW signal is dependant on the keying Speed as well as the rise and fall time of each cw element. If keying is too soft it is difficult to copy a weak signal with; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00559.html (13,226 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:41:58 -0600; A good audio spectrum analyzer, such as one using a computer sound card with rapid updates and fine resolution in a falling water display should show it readily. Or alternatively, an audio oscillator; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00562.html (8,848 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@igLou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:49:07 -0500; You mean theres not some kind of fancy spectrum analyzer that could measure it? Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Paul Christensen" <paulc@mediaone.net> To: "Steve Ellington" <n4lq@iglou.com>;; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00563.html (18,704 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:57:35 -0500; Some good points Jerry. Provided that the audio spectrum analyzer is fast and capable of displaying resolution of less than 10 Hz, it may be of some use. Regarding the use of an audio oscillator agai; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00564.html (9,050 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:19:32 -0500; "Hmmm.... This doesn't match the ARRL/QST Labs results as printed in their review of the VI+. The keying waveshape was textbook perfect." In looking at the keying waveform from the QST review of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00580.html (9,361 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A Calvin); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:29:25 -0600; Both the VI and VI+ reports show risetimes in the 2.0 - 2.5 ms range. According to the QST reviews, both make statements to the effect that this is "exceptional" or "excellent" keying waveshape. Perh; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00584.html (11,015 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:17:34 -0500; Correct to the extent that CW bandwidth may be minimized. I don't necessarily agree with Tom's view that the "correct" CW waveform is one in which the transmitted bandwidth is minimized by extending; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00586.html (10,223 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:41:29 -0500; The most beautiful sounding cw note I ever heard was that of a Drake TR3. I can remember hearing it some 37 years ago! Just a few days ago, I heard one again and I was overwhelmed. One of these days,; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00587.html (11,470 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:46:45 -0500; That's a great idea for a contest but the poor slob running a Lakeshore Phasemaster 2b and Hallicrafters SX101A would be at a big disadvantage for his run rate. Let's see.....what's the shortest rig; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00588.html (11,247 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:15:41 -0500; Some TR7s and C-Lines sound exceptionally good. I still recall the sound of Paul, K4CA who used a T4XC modified for QSK. I once looked at his waveform to see what was happening and it was a mirror im; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00590.html (13,255 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:10:45 -0600; Paul and all, Back in the dark ages of the mid-40's I built the famous old "electronic keyer" that had been in the Handbook for several years (page 141 of the 1946 edition). You know, the one with fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00597.html (13,171 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:48:29 -0700; In fact, you can. The instrument has to be able to capture a signal and show you the signal's frequency vs. time. This type of plot is called a "spectrogram" and can be found on instruments called Ve; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00619.html (19,093 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]