- 1. [TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac (score: 1)
- Author: Ku7i@worldnet.att.net (Lane Zeitler)
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:54:59 -0700
- Gents, I rcv'd this today from the amps reflector. Interesting to note that this does not jive with what several folks have stated T-T reported. Lane Ku7i -- Original Message -- From: Tom Hix W4TH <w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00116.html (10,712 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac (score: 1)
- Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb)
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:46:45 +0000
- Just checked Richardson't catalog. 3CX800A7's are $523 each there. They are EIMAC's 73 de Brian/K3KO -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrat
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00117.html (11,588 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac (score: 1)
- Author: Ku7i@worldnet.att.net (Lane Zeitler)
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:35:25 -0700
- Ouch!!!!!! The 4CX800 conversion is looking more attractive. Lane Ku7i -- Original Message -- From: alsopb <alsopb@gloryroad.net> To: Lane Zeitler <Ku7i@worldnet.att.net> Cc: <tentec@contesting.com>
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00118.html (8,166 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac (score: 1)
- Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:37:58 -0700
- I wonder what Tentec has to say about this. I'd suspect that it is a warranty issue vs price issue between the Eimac product and the user. As I recall Eimac limits its warranty to the purchaser and d
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00120.html (11,032 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac (score: 1)
- Author: w2fca@qsl.net (Frank Ayers)
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 19:22:45 -0400
- Check out this site - http://www.cshore.com/lunarlink/ampcost.html Steve lists Eimac at $405 and Svetlana at $345. Never bought any yet, but I may considering I like my Titan Frank W2FCA -- FAQ on WW
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00123.html (8,207 bytes)
- 6. [TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac (score: 1)
- Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 04:12:50 -0400
- The issue, TTers, is simple. The escalating cost of the 3CX800A7 forced Ten-Tec to stop production of the Titan I. The tubes were readily available but the cost just drove the amp beyond profitabilit
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00129.html (8,820 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu