Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Future\s+of\s+Radio\s+$Was$\s+ARRL\s+product\s+review\s+test\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Future\s+of\s+Radio\s+$Was$\s+ARRL\s+product\s+review\s+test\s+change\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Future of Radio (Was) ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:34:54 -0700 (PDT); This being catch 22 is true to a limited point, but it has more to do with the evolution of technology. These issues of DSP and other digital artifacts are akin to the transition from tube receivers; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00256.html (20,064 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Future of Radio (Was) ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: ve1adh@accesswave.ca (Dave McClafferty); Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:12:55 -0300; I.F. DSP now uses frequencies of 12-15 Khz. This will undoubtedly change and higher I.F. frequencies will become possible. When they do many of the problems with internally generated anomalies will d; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00258.html (22,961 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Future of Radio (Was) ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:36:00 -0500; While "some" radios do use 12-15 KHz for IF-DSP, others now use 36-40 KHz and do a much better job, in addition to using 32-bit processing and 24-bit ad/da conversions. But you are correct: when DSP; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00259.html (9,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]