I did search the archives but found nothing current about the Pegasus compared to Flex-Radio SDR-1000. Now that the Pegasus has been discontinued, is SDR-1000 the only "living" game in town for SDR?
With the improvements to the flex-radio software(I understand it is open source) it will surpass the pegasus. Yes, it is the only game in town. A very interesting game it is. Take a look at their web
They're already claiming the best blocking dynamic range at 2Khz of ANY radio. 95-96 dB, if I recall. I spent a lot of time playing with one at Dallas Ham-com last weekend. I may have to find a few
What's wrong with this picture? ARRL measured Orion as 120dB BDR at 1Khz spacing on p19 of the expanded review. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.c
Sorry ... That should have been IMD DR3 not blocking dynamic range. That's what was wrong with the picture. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
Grant, Consider the SDR is a direct conversion receiver compared to the superhet and filtering options of the K2. The earlier you filter in a radio the better, so the conventional front end of the K2
Get the QST reviews of the SDR radio and the Pegasus side by side, and you will have your information. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest
I haven't seen a comparison of the current incarnation of the Flex to other radios, T-T or otherwise. My only point was (1) it is an interesting radio and (2) they CLAIM they have the best IMDDR3 of
Stuart, I have used both the SDR-1000 and Jupiter. The SDR-1000 I think has a better receiver. The BRD is low, but I don't know what it is in the Jupiter. Not the greatest I'm guessing. The K2 beats
Actually the Pegasus shares much more in common with the more traditional radios out there than the ideal concept of "SDR". Yes it has updateable firmware but it is a "tradition radio" first and SDR
Not really. The review of the SDR-1000 was done with the radio incorrectly configured. This miss configuration was due to the proper instructions for its setup not being made available to the ARRL. F
Having owned the Flex SDR, 100w version, and having owned a Pegasus for a long time I can say this: The Flex radio is very very PC, sound card and software dependent. If I were going to use the Flex
Maybe I'm missing something here... but considering that the Jupiter started development as the Pegasus FP (as in "Front Panel"), isn't it just a touch premature to write the Pegasus line off? The or
Not sure what you mean by that. Can you givw me an example? (look and what both N4PY and _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contest
Susceptibility to out of band especially Broadcast signals is an inherent trait of Direct Conversion receivers. They essentially have a Zero IF frequency, and Lots of audio gain, which means they are
Hi, If original ARRL review was working on incorrect Flex instructions, then they may have an update of Flex Radio review on the ARRL web site. they have an extended tests section of reviews. However
Thanks for the comparison of SDR to Jupiter receiver which is same as Peg. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesti