Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Filters\s*$/: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: rtecw@charter.net (John Embry); Date: Fri May 2 11:38:18 2003; Only have left the 282 and 285 filters from my Omni 6 for sale. The others have been sold. John Embry Slidell La rtecw@charter.net; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00020.html (6,274 bytes)
2. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: sonny@jvlnet.com (Sonny Eisenberg); Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:36:56 -0600; Scott , W3TX has an ad on QTH for sale Tentec filters # 217, 218, 285, = 288. you might contact him. Sonny WA9KXQ Happy New Year To All ! -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alte; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00537.html (6,307 bytes)
3. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: wa9dgm@aol.com (wa9dgm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:58:01 EST; have upgraded to inrad filters so 2 filters are for sale: model 217 cw 500hz 9mhz $60 shipped. model 220 ssb 2.4khz 9mhz $60 shipped e-mail wa9dgm@aol.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00156.html (6,175 bytes)
4. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: w8zh@juno.com (w8zh@juno.com); Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 17:30:32 -0400; looking for filters # 217 and 288, anyone have anything....t.y. w8zh@juno.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00314.html (6,522 bytes)
5. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: w7itc@hotmail.com (Kenneth Crips); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:53:39 MDT; That filter almost sounds like the four pole filter My Argosy uses as it's "fixed" filter, not the 250hz, 500hz, 1.8khz, units. I was checking the International Radio filter and it isn't one of their; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00373.html (7,357 bytes)
6. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:09:01 -0400; The biggest improvement in the Argosy is achieved by replacing that 4-pole filter with the model 220 8-pole filter. I operate only CW, but that 8-pole filter made a big difference! (I also have the a; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00374.html (7,994 bytes)
7. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:22:59 -0700 (PDT); The INRAD filters are "better" in that they have steeper skirts and a little lower loss. They are built better physically. They are "worse" in that they are more expensive, are not easy to repair if; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00375.html (7,553 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: w4ma@earthlink.net (BILL BURNETTE); Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:57:42 -0400; The #285 & #217 filters have been sold. Thanks to all. 73 Bill W4MA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@c; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00197.html (6,470 bytes)
9. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: whowell@hq.nasa.gov (Scott Howell); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:07:56 -0400; I wonder if anyone saw my msg regarding filters. short run over it again. I know I asked, but can't find the notes I made so thought to drag this up from the mud once again. I have an Omni-V and it h; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00373.html (8,406 bytes)
10. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: JimN0OCT@aol.com (JimN0OCT@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:25:25 EDT; HI Scott, Can't answer your Omni questions, as I only own a Corsair and an Argonaut. I can vouch for the InRad filters, though. I have the stock TT filters in all positions [9 MHz IF] except 250 Hz,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00374.html (8,057 bytes)
11. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:26:10 -0400 (EDT); The only time I really needed the 500hz filter in cascade with the 500hz or 250hz filter in the 2nd IF was during the 160m cw contest. Stations running 1KW+++ with huge arrays all crammed into a narr; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00375.html (9,149 bytes)
12. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: pinskeep@iglou.com (Peter Inskeep); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:50:43 -0400; Scott, As I have an Omni VI +, rather than a V, I did not initially reply. However, how much difference can there be in the two as far as filters go, since they apparently use at least some of the sa; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00376.html (11,074 bytes)
13. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:55:46 -0400; rig. I assume in YOUR rig you have used the TT 250Hz filter then opted for the Inrad filter. How good can it get? Pretty expensive test, can I have your spare TT 250Hz filter? I'll give $25 for that; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00377.html (7,997 bytes)
14. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 15:10:41 -0400; de Joe, AA4NN About filters, they are wonderful and whether InRad or TT, they do the job. If you don't work CW much, then you are a casual user of that mode and you don't need a 250Hz filter! Are you; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00378.html (7,643 bytes)
15. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: k4beh@juno.com (k4beh@juno.com); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 20:32:27 -0400; Joe and all you filter-tips, I have a Paragon with all available Ten-Tec filters. I love both CW filters and have found that by judicious use of the 250 hZ, PBT and audio filters I can pull out stati; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00380.html (7,915 bytes)
16. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 01:43:57 +0100 (BST); You CAN work CW effectively with only the stock TT SSB filters, but under crowded band conditions it takes a fair bit of practice to do it. Its much more comfortable to listen to a narrower bandwidth; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00381.html (11,839 bytes)
17. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: whowell@hq.nasa.gov (Scott Howell); Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 16:08:15 -0500; wonder if my msg regarding filters ever got to the list. Does not look as if it did so I'll repost. If you did see it then please excuse the repeat. I have an Omni V. I first off need to know if I op; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00095.html (7,851 bytes)
18. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:00:20 -0000 (GMT); Scott; you do not need to take the bottom off, unless you need to change a filter. The right hand filter button is the "narrow" option for the 9 mHz IF on the Omni-V. Hit the narrow button and tune t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00109.html (10,684 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: coates@oceana.net (Harry &Sara Coates); Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:44:47 -0400; Hi Everyone, I was looking at one of the internet hamfests and someone had a pair of custom made ($850) 3.1khz filters for Omni VI fs. Is this possible? The last time filters wider than 2.4khz were d; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00175.html (7,002 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:38:10 -0700; That sounds like LOT to pay for custom made filters. 3.1 KHz would be a nice bandwidth though. I would like to hear more about them as you find out :-) . I never could figure out what Ten Tec was wor; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00176.html (7,036 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]