Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Filter\s+Choice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Filter\s+Choice\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Filter Choice (score: 1): Author: Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com (Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com); Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 13:48:38 -0400; I have the INRAD 400 Hz first and 2nd IF filters for my Omni-6+. they are great for CW work. I'm looking to upgrade the ssb side, and am looking for recommendations. Is the INRAD 2.4 kHz 1st IF filte; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00483.html (7,219 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Filter Choice (score: 1): Author: JimN0OCT@aol.com (JimN0OCT@aol.com); Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 14:01:30 EDT; HI Eric, Don't know if you've been to InRad's web site recently, but they have a 1st IF 10-pole filter for SSB now. Don't know anyone using it, but it does look intriguing! 73, Jim NØOCT -- FA; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00486.html (7,466 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Filter Choice (score: 1): Author: k7kj@teleport.com (Greg Hodsdon); Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 17:14:32 -0700; Eric: I have been using the Inrad 751 (250hz, 6.3Mhz IF), 752 (2.1khz, 9Mhz) and 753 (400hz, 9Mhz IF) since purchasing the Omni 6+ new in October '98. The 756 (2.4khz, 9Mhz, 10 pole filter) was insta; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00495.html (8,862 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Filter Choice (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 18:45:53 -0700 (PDT); Appreciate your filter experiences Greg! Wow, isn't it great to have so many choices!!! I just wanted to add a comment about the 2.8 filters. I don't quite follow your comment about this filter being; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00497.html (8,651 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]