Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+and\s+\"6N2\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+and\s+\"6N2\"\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: jmlowman@ix.netcom.com (Jim Lowman); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:20:17 -0700; I had to cut Field Day a bit short this year, so I went up to the mountains for the afternoon. A couple of our QRP club members have set up a 6m/2m/432 MHz station the past two years, in conjunction; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00217.html (9,203 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: James Parsons" <k5rov@arrl.net (James Parsons); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:36:46 -0500; Also pleased to hear a bit of CW on 6m, WHAT??? 73 de Jim, K5ROV... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00218.html (7,732 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: wg6h@pacbell.net (Bill Miner); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:17:47 -0700; Jim, Thanks for the Field day report on the T-T 6N2. I have mine on order but don't expect to receive it until sometime in July. Can you give any information on how the 6N2 receiver performed on a cr; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00219.html (10,423 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: jmlowman@ix.netcom.com (Jim Lowman); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:51:39 -0700; What's the lead time these days? Seems like it took about 10 days-two weeks to make it to SoCal from the time of ordering. By no means am I an expert on VHF - just enjoy using those bands occasionall; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00221.html (9,375 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:10:19 -0700; Jim & Bill and others. Interesting and optimistic reading regarding the Tentec 6N2 rig. While I'm not to be considered an expert on VHF, but I have and work a lot of VHF, I too agree that when the ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00222.html (11,582 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:12:18 -0700; Jim; Thanks for the report on your 526. I am, in a word, ENVIOUS! My 526 is still in "component form" at the various vendors that Ten Tec buys their parts from. Anyone else out there have anything to; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00227.html (10,080 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:20:52 -0700; Jim; I used to work a lot of 6 meters back in the 60s (mostly AM back then) and the band usage was pretty much the same except that people used to cluster between 50.200 - 50.250 MHz. I always though; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00228.html (10,417 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Field Day and "6N2" (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:55:16 -0700 (PDT); I have noticed that field day ops are some of the worst for crowding the calling frequencies on VHF and UHF. I can only attribute that behavior to many of the operators being primarily HF operators w; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00238.html (13,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]