- 1. [TenTec] Faraday cage (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 10:20:29 -1000
- The only way a Faraday cage around your shack could save your radio equipment from the effects of RF would be if every single cable had perfectly balanced RF currents so that no cable inside the sha
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00062.html (9,587 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 18:16:20 -0400
- That's right Ken. And don't forget to mention that you would also have to avoid ground loops inside the cage. We had a faraday cage at work (Kodak) where we did RF emissions and susceptibility testin
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00065.html (10,657 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage (score: 1)
- Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:35:10 -0500
- They had something not right in that Faraday cage, if you had noise inside. Of course, copper does not adequately block low frequency magnetic field components, and that likely was the source of your
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00074.html (10,059 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:32:30 -0400
- Well yes they did. But I think the point made by the other poster was that noise can be generated inside the faraday cage, by the problematic wiring he mentioned, rendering the cage useless. That in
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00076.html (10,910 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:34:32 -0700
- Yes. A Faraday cage is, by definition, an Electric shield. It is NOT a magnetic shield at low frequencies. In the near field of a field produced by current, the field is primarily a magnetic field.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00081.html (10,719 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu