Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FW\:\s+\[Icom\]\s+RE\:\s+Icom\s+Japan\s+IC\-7800\s+announcement\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "RM" <kamar@inr.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:23:56 -0500
Icom's strategy here seems fairly open: 1. develop a basic architecture adaptable to the commercial/military markets where the real money is. 2. build and sell a first generation to the amateur marke
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00585.html (10,289 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:57:35 -0600
The following has been cross-posted to this reflector by "RM" (kamar@inr.net) without my permission. These remarks were intended for the Icom reflector only. They represent my opinion which I was not
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00587.html (13,469 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:05:50 -0500
George, I can see why you don't want them cross-posted. But, an old war horse like you ought to know by now not to post anything, anywhere, if there are people who you wish not to see it. hehehehe...
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00588.html (15,277 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:15:38 -0600
Yeah, Gary - my Momma used to say "never say anything you wouldn't want repeated in church!" Still, it is a pretty sneaky trick to play, Mr. "RM". Since my name is already mud on this reflector, I gu
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00590.html (9,766 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "Lynn Lamb" <w4nl@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:15:58 -0500
I can understand your disappointment George, W5YR.. a ghastly thing to do. I'd be ashamed of these words too and wouldn't want them on this fine reflector! The very best to you George, W5YR, lynn W4N
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00592.html (15,108 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "Don K5AQ" <donhall@myriad.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:36:54 -0600
Temper, temper, George. 73 Don K5AQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00593.html (7,857 bytes)

7. RE: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Martin" <royalct@inr.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:54:57 -0500
Gee, You really believe that stuff you post on reflectors is secure and not available to any one else on the internet? Do you also believe that your fellow hams do not belong to other 'reflectors' an
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00596.html (16,710 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:17:48 -0500
"If you do not want your remarks to be repeated, then don't make them." Really? This isn't a matter of copyright law or internet security. But it is a matter of common-courtesy and decency. He simply
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00598.html (19,427 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "J. D." <duffyb01@fuse.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:00:05 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
If you don't want something cross-posted, quoted, etc., don't post it anywhere on the Internet. No different than quoting the text from a book, newspaper, etc. These are not "for your eyes only" mess
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00599.html (20,332 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu