- 1. [TenTec] External Filters (score: 1)
- Author: nw4p@martha.xtn.net (nw4p@martha.xtn.net)
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 20:53:22 -0400
- Hello Everyone, Before I go and spend a couple of hundred bucks on some filters for my Omni, is there anyone out there that can give me some feedback on your experience with external filters, good or
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00058.html (7,385 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] External Filters (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Branch" <tom.branch@qth.com (Tom Branch)
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 21:17:59 -0500
- Richard, I just bought a 1.8, 500, and 250 for $170 shipped here on the list. I love the Tentec filters! Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Adm
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00060.html (7,813 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] External Filters (score: 1)
- Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson)
- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 22:58:02 -0500
- Experience in these parts, by the picky operators indicates that the Timewave DSP series outperforms the MFJ and RS. I have a DSP-59+ and it has quite good selectivity, is extremely versatile, handle
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00061.html (7,809 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] External Filters (score: 1)
- Author: cherry@neta.com (Jim FitzSimons)
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 06:48:43 -0700
- Richard, if you want the best performance with strong stations near then the external filter can never equal the internal filters. My Pegasus which uses DSP can never equal a Omni, but the Pegasus ha
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00063.html (7,941 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] External Filters (score: 1)
- Author: RMcGraw@blomand.net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 02:48:22 -0700
- I totally agree. I use the Tentec filters 500 Hz and 250 Hz and a DSP9+ with the Omni VI+ for the EME operation on 144 MHz and 432 MHz. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tente
- /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00067.html (8,290 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu