Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Equipment\s+reviews\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Equipment\s+reviews\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:59:14 EST; Howdy rig warriors! I have been QRL, but reading some of the arguments about equipment testing, evaluation, comparisons. ARRL is doing decent job with reviews, tests, but still looking at things thro; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00631.html (9,130 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 01:47:21 +0000; Well, it's been an interesting thread. Big smoke, small fire! It's amazing how much heat even a highly favorable report can generate. I suspect it would take a well funded, completely independent, no; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00632.html (8,771 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:54:19 EST; advertising magazine, with a well equipped lab, staffed by enthusiastic contesters and DXers, to do rig tests the way rig tests should be done. << OK, lets start here, this is the most evangelical gr; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00648.html (10,338 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:47:58 +0000; Well, Yuri, some of the members of the group are certainly evangelical enough. A few are downright rabid. And a truely independent rig test is certainly a commendable goal. However much I quibble abo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00669.html (8,193 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:11:29 EST; test equipment calibrated to NIST standards at the beginning of each test, would satisfy the technically oriented part of our community.<< I am not going to argue about difference of 0.001 of dB betw; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00673.html (7,873 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:22:56 +0100; Yuri, I like your approach (hands-on). - 73 - Rick ("Just do it"). available test equipment calibrated to NIST standards at the beginning of each test, would satisfy the technically oriented part of; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00675.html (8,659 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: Mike Manship <w9oj@peoplepc.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:40:42 -0500; Heath used a 2 pin connector. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00677.html (7,392 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1): Author: "Jack Burchfield" <jburchfield@tentec.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 10:27:43 -0500; Noel, You have to find something to do! Reading this crap will only make you mad. Jack _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00236.html (6,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]