Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Emergency\s+Networks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Emergency\s+Networks\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:57:48 -0500; Actually Broadband Ham Net has nothing to do with the symbol rate change that is proposed by FCC and was backed by ARRL. ARRL was trying to do away with artificial baud rate limits which make packet; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00615.html (9,853 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:09:08 -0700; On 5/22/2014 3:57 PM, Stuart Rohre wrote: The CW and RTTY low end of the bands crowd have the attention of the ARRL Board now, and the Board hopefully will come up with a coexistence plan Such that C; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00616.html (10,127 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:21:05 -0400; Stuart, According to the response to the "digital users will have to listen", please refer to the response filed by APRS. (see the ARRL FAQ) In short "monitoring is impractical to listen for all othe; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00618.html (10,593 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks (score: 1): Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:33:44 -0400; Stuart makes very good points. Calling to order pizza on 2m being allowed was one foolishness, but allowing unattended digi garbage that transmits without listening first, and/or is unattended, makes; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00621.html (11,563 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]